img courtesy: https://www.charliekirk.com/
Via: https://truthout.org/articles/far-right-activist-charlie-kirk-shot-and-killed-at-utah-university/
[UPDATE TO THIS POST 9/25/2025]
Conservative activist Charlie Kirk has died at 31, after being shot in the neck at an event at Utah Valley University on Wednesday. President Donald Trump announced Kirk’s death in a post on Truth Social. Kirk’s spokesperson Andrew Kolvet also confirmed that he had died.
Video displays the atrocity and the shooter is on the run. A man held in custody attending the event was not the shooter. “The shooting shows Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), speaking in a tent on a lawn. The tent is labelled ‘The American Comeback’ and ‘prove me wrong,’ with a large crowd gathered.” Condolences to his wife and two children.
[Update 9/25]
After reviewing video footage, it appears Kirk received a wound to his head with an exit wound from the neck region. There seems to be backlash from the community and retired military personnel concerning the FBI narrative. The rifle recovered “in the woods” is a pathetic storyline, seeing the scope wasn’t installed properly. That doesn’t necessarily mean the FBI made the story up, it just means they found a rifle that wasn’t used in the killing by someone attempting to throw off investigations.
And then there is the major problem of the crime scene itself. Completely dismantled by staff, LOL, very badly choreographed btw, but I guess it doesn’t need to be perfect. All on Turning Point cameras, which can stream up to 6k – all the faces, all the gear, the hand-off of equipment, all in plain sight.
But wow, no establishment of a crime scene, while the head of University security stands about twddling fingers, reeks of predisposed narrative. The “I don’t care about a crime scene narrative” from the top end of Law Enforcement is bizarre and I’m sure they have many ridiculous excuses for such that no legitimate forensic organization would listen to.
No point in cordoning off the area when it’s established exactly what’s going to happen, right? I mean why do we need an investigation at the scene, what purpose, when the purpose is to just clean it up straighaway. Place pavers down and turn the exact spot into a memorial, without sniffing every inch of the area – as a detective would do for a crime scene you walked into, having no knowledge of what occurred. Ya know, so you could establish motive, gather evidence, take measurements and forensic samples n such – NOPE! No need, when you already know what went down and the only motive is to clean up.
I haven’t paid much attention to this, but I can see why retired police chiefs and military personnel have made some keen, obvioulsy frustrated, colorful statements.
I personally see two different shooter narratives, one from a rooftop balcony (teachers lounge), not the fabricated Tyler Robinson story, who is the forefront patsy of mainstream news, and the other position directly in front of Kirk. The theory posted by ex-military snipers and other sources recount, with an added non-shooter theory circulating:
- a balcony shooting from the teachers lounge area (angle seems to match trajectory of hit)
- a man shooting a palm pistol less than twenty feet away; Kirk’s 3 O’clock (contrary to exit wound)
- explosive ear device (unlikely)
I’m not speculating these theory, it’s not my theory – this is data from ex-military personnel and footage from by-standers in the crowd, in which experienced spectators are making the case.
Mainstream media does not report the other shooter theories and remains focused on the Tyler Robinson ridiculous story which appears to contradict various shooting angles, video capture, audio analysis, and expert military analysis. It smells of fiction and no need to delve into fictions and no one believes the mainstream news anymore. Everyone knows they are paid-for institutions and any investigator worth their salt already knows preceisely who the boards of directors are in these corporations, who funds them, their stock purchases, backgrounds, and connections.
So I would consider this a post-censored society where the sheep are awake, have lost their fear, desensitized, and anticipate more shenanigans until the dam breaks. And according to computer modeling, when the dam breaks, these organizations are doomed with no place to hide and will flee the country as occurs every time in history.
Alt-news has been inundated with a theory Kirk is in “witness protection,” based on FBI Director Kash Patel’s “valhalla” and “33” hours statement (roll eyes). 33 hours and 47 degrees…memes everywhere.
Shuffled into witness protection? I don’t think so.
Experts having viewed the moment the supposed projectile hit his body, it has been determined it was a death shot. You can clearly see Mr. Kirk’s arms freeze in upwards positions upon impact, generally recognized by anyone who has killed an animal hunting or having witnessed such as examination from a tactical perspective. In a hostage situation, we could expect a firearm being discharged into the air, with the arms frozen, but the immediate threat would be anyone standing in the position of the exit, if you wanted to alleviate bystanders in the crowd getting hit from a tumbling round.
So the big question, drum roll….why did they do it?
Just my personal opinion, Kirk as a possible presidential candidate in the future was a probable threat to current picks and maybe their computer forecasts projected him winning and upsetting their plans, all speculation of course, and I am unable to know what his faith was in Christianity, whether strong and aligned, or politically motivated.
I would think it abject that Kirk was murdered for refusing to take money, or just simply being able to sway the audience he commanded, as there are many personnas that do the same without threat of buying groceries. The more likely scenario is he had a bit of dirt on people, the usual motivation, with the ability to broadcast that dirt to millions of people at his whim, which could really alter public opinion and possibly their investments being derailed as an outcome, embarassment, or expose in such a regard.
Real power is being able to rip apart a heavily funded organization publicly to the mob, like Elon did with USAID, in which the mob then runs around with their hair on fire wanting to do something about it, regardless if the data given is accurate or not. It’s certainly no excuse for any organization to commit murder over dollars or defilement and you would expect that your government would do something to go after those responsible with the same amount of force using Special Forces to exact justice.
It’s an ongoing investigation according to A.I.,“Federal and state prosecutors are still actively working on the legal process, with Robinson facing charges of aggravated murder and other felonies, and a death penalty case is expected to proceed.”
Pretty sad right? Seeing that just about everyone at this point suspects Robinson didn’t shoot anyone, or did he?
And if we read Robinson’s statement about, “waiting out and wanting to retrieve his rifle, but a squad car (LOL) was there,” and the terminology used in the statement, “dude” for example, forensically was a statement from someone in their mid 40’s to 50’s and so it’s real difficult to fool anyone now with manicured text messages, statements and the like, seeing we have this thing called computer forensics which examines the statements from millions of writers, age groups, and scenarios, ya know so we can solve murder mysteries and such. No one, and I mean no one, can hide their upbringing, education, views on society, or their particular way of speaking when it comes to analysis forensics of the speech.
Just by examining Tyler Robinson’s enormous profile in social media you can cut and paste that data into an A.I. and cross reference all his statements to see what stands out, what particular words he often uses, which becomes his fingerprint for writing in general. And then you can determine whether any statements from him are “ficticious.” Fairly simple stuff. Now imagine using commercial software that allows us to do this much better than the A.I. software the average joe is using.
So it’s pretty difficult in the technology world we live to fabricate video, text, and statements from certain age groups when all of it can be examined with a 80%+ success rate. For some odd reason, either these groups out there don’t understand that yet, or they simply don’t care. Take your pick.
I’m sure mainstream narratives will be debunked and ridiculed, with memes into oblivion. One has to ask, “why does MSM always provide a fake cover-up story and if we examine such through A.I., and the data is conclusive, why do we not interview the heads of networks to find out why they’re covering it up?” I think the heads of networks should be point blank asked, “who told you to cover this up?” or “who told you to coordinate concocted narratives for the viewing audience?” under law enforcement interrogation. Meaning if news network people don’t want to give up how they had a pre-disposed narrative to work with, ready to go, when an event takes place, then they are held without bail – indefinitely until they give up some answers.
Would this violate their rights, or are these necessary measures to put an end to news agencies being aware of assassinations or terrorist events beforehand? I’m not expecting any pushback against the media, besides what the public does. I do expect these organizations to implode upon themselves from their own staff, who come to realize they’re employed by terrorist organizations and flee these unethical traitor enterprises.
Right? Common sense tells you if local police can’t do their jobs, there’s a reason for that. We have seen investigations where Police Detectives were actively silencing investigations into heroin over-dose deaths, due to the fact the detectives were the drug dealers and squashing any investigation that required them to do so. Until they were caught and arrested of course, and then folded on everyone like a hundred dollar bill to cut deals with prosecutors for themselves.
You see we do still have this thing called Law in every State of America, with people who actually do prosecute criminals, drug lords, murderers, and even those abusing their positions in law enforcement.
Moreover, if certain news agencies are involved with knowledge of events or being coerced to cover up events, then the focus should always be on investigating their networks. If you have the structure in place to watch their every move as events unfold these fools will lead you directly to the main source of the problem. As long as you always keep tabs on their movements then they’ll lead you to the perps everytime fyi.
The news guys have been pretty good at compartmentalizing their initiatives, or knowledge they “receive,” however from a technology stand point they’re way behind the curve now. I expect these organizations to keep imploding as news networks shift back to the average joe building his empire from scratch with more followers, while these old, out of date, parrot news networks continue to request censorship to keep themselves in power, when it’s no longer possible to do so.
The reality these corporate heads fail to realize, or maybe they do realize, is that the citizens hate them now. From the anchor you see on TV, to the brainless journalist doing interviews with prepared statements, to parroting themselves across a broad network – citizens are awake to this, as they were when revolting against England in unison. The can shore up their corps with money from the government to keep themselves in business to no avail, as the population pretty much believes the opposite of whatever they say, or scrutinizes at any given moment and that’s not going to change.
The government fully understands this, as it’s a daily numbers game right, and so I believe at the end of the day moving into a transparent business atmosphere, as a politician, you’re going to have to be straight laced, or your dirt will be revealed by X amount of writers, or people with axes to grind as proven by the Biden laptop and other non-convenient whistle blowers that cannot be stopped due to technology.
If you decide to be blackmailed, or take bribes to parrot narratives, technology doesn’t allow a cap on the “secret” anymore. Ok so now you have to contend with a cultural mentality that wants to expose everything as soon as a snippet comes out. Everyone is a detective in their own right now, or believe they are, because of technology. So this new paradigm, where the population understands that their leaders are completely blackmailed, this shift if you call it that, will be groups getting new security services that are not attached to LE or ex-government guys, because it’s just too risky.
I think that’s what comes out of the Charlie Kirk murder is that no one will trust a hired security staff and why would you? The best praised superhero, ex-special forces guy is not going to keep you alive – that was just proven. You can train new personnel in six months to do what these security professionals do and they all have guns right. As long as they are trained to shoot back and protect you and get better at it the more they do it – why then would you hire a security company that’s possibly compromised or accept a security detail on loan from another entity? It’s dumb if you do and I think higher end executives understand that fully now.
Keep up the great work out there citizen journalists and retired military heroes and police – you do a great work for your community, keep it up!
