How’s it going out there in your world?
Should we talk about political things, all the ills of the political circus? How about the bad guys that try to keep themselves in power at the expense of all others?
From urban dictionary:
politician
1. A person who practices politics.
“Politics” is derived from the words “poly” meaning “many”, and “tics” meaning “blood-sucking parasites.”
2. One who was perfected the art of lying.
3. A highly paid yes-man.
politician
As of now, if you haven’t noticed, there has been a purge in the so-called conservative alt-news circle of truthers.
As well as keen infiltration of low level wealthy groups who have opinions about shaping the world or how the world should be without government.
People who live in wealth tend to forget that the government has been doing what they do for a very long time. The policy from hundred year old government departments may vary from degree to degree, however, initial traditional practice is salted in there. Meaning, it’s very normal to draw your enemies close around you and then eliminate them one by one. I think we can call that a couple thousand year old policy but something government defines as action through a adepartment.
Will there be a need for politicians in the future after all these videos, emails, and live performance clips keep circulating the internet telling us who these people really are, what they do, and why they do it?
I think Americans realize that politicians are actors. They are indeed paid liars at the end of the day. That’s all one needs to know about politicians in the year 2025. But if you dig deeper, you’ll find they’re usually blackmailed to do what they do, or they belong to a group that grants them favors, either as a priviledge or forced.
What remains clear, is that the world over it’s a race to be the winner in all things, not just politics, but all things: tech, sports, medicine, weapons, social, fiat and commodity control.
So mankind really is racing, like an Olympic sprinter doing the Marathon. And they’re chugging along to see if they can win – if their group can win. And some of these Olympians are willing to die in that race to win. Pheidippides never gave his life running the news of Marathon and should really be an understanding of all the knowledge shoved in your face today – most is fake, or hearsay.
The Marathon race today is a fictional lie based on real events, as is all politics you see in your square box.
I think the word “politician,” is quite frankly too tainted now. It’s got to fade as a “word” in use. It’s a hated word, so therefore the etymology will update as people stop using it and/or continue memeing. If you’re called a “politician” watch the faces of people when you say the word. Instant rejection on their faces as you can see with facial recognition software:
Software Solutions
-
iMotions (with Affectiva AFFDEX module): Utilizes AI and FACS-based approaches to detect seven core emotions through either live or recorded video feeds, offering robust analysis and data visualization tools. Its accuracy has been validated and is particularly adept at distinguishing happiness, sadness, surprise, anger, fear, contempt, and disgust in real time.
-
FaceReader (by Noldus): Widely used for automatic facial expression recognition, analyzing key emotions such as happiness, sadness, anger, surprise, and fear from static images or videos. It also supports voice analysis for a more complete emotional profile.
-
Visage Technologies: Offers real-time emotion recognition SDKs for integration with a variety of platforms. It detects common facial emotions and is known for applications in both business intelligence and customer experience settings.
-
Emotient/Facet: Software designed to analyze subtle facial features to detect not only basic emotions but the authenticity of expressions (such as distinguishing real from fake smiles).
-
Imentiv AI: Aims to provide multimodal emotion recognition by combining facial, vocal, and text data for a more holistic understanding of emotions.
Accuracy and Applications
-
Latest reviews and systematic studies confirm that top-tier FER software achieves high accuracy for recognizing “positive” emotions like happiness and surprise (often above 96%), while accuracy tends to be lower for negative or ambiguous emotions such as anger or disgust (around 91-94%).
-
FER technology is used in fields ranging from healthcare (mental health monitoring, patient engagement) to marketing, customer usability research, and adaptive interfaces.
Companies like Fisher-Price work with Noldus using their facial recognition software for developing toys. Reading the emotions of faces to decide what toy works and what doesn’t.
Ok this begins at infant six months and up to read emotions and determine what people want to use, and how they learn, or what they reject instantly. Ok and these psychological factors are utilized society wide for product placement, political enhancement, or enforced mental training.
So the bottom line is, will society really need politicians when we can read the facial structures? We can see the lies in real time with our software. Ok, yes the costs of these products are currently quite expensive, but that’s going to change very rapidly here. And the average Joe will be able to use filters on video uploads which can tell a person from a live stream what his emotions are directly from an app on the phone with 95% accuracy.
Pretty much a game changer in the political arena. There is no way to stop this tech, unless you crash everything in the next coming years, which we already know the outcome of that scenario so any sane government will try to prolong any of that nature from ever going down, which also parallels government collapse globally – so it’s a scenario to be avoided that is deconstruction, as it’s everyones demise as well known now.
The better scenario which of course government disagrees with, is the shrinking of government, and a more soverign scenario for citizens – they argue that’s what they’re trying to do of course. But we believe we have a better outlook for the future than they do concerning homeostasis, technology moderation, and biome protection.
The argument is that everyone has very very smart PhD level computers making scenarios 24 hours a day, seven days a week – without end of every facet of possible outcome for humanity – models upon models, upon models.
And who has the best human outcome model post 2028? Hmm? I would probably argue that the Saudi Kingdom does atm, not those who think they can live in bunkers in Florida, Hawaii, and New Zealand.
So as everyone runs this race from Marathon and WE ALL think we can win or have a better plan – who gets to decide?
