Home Living The U.S. Invades Europe

The U.S. Invades Europe

Photo Courtesy Houston Chronicle

Right now the United States is the most advanced, trained, battle hardened, and equipped militarily on the planet. The Chinese Army in a time of War outnumbers us 10 to 1, roughly speaking, but this matters little as compared to the U.S. and Russian Federation nuclear arsenal.

Forty years ago with the former Soviet Union as a power, the United States would never have attempted to invade Iraq or any allied sovereign country for it’s resources. However, with the threat of the Soviet Union subsided and the Russian Federation vying to establish an economy amidst the birth of a new nation the United States has taken the lead in power – especially military power and has more freedom to take interest in varying projects around the globe.

Great Britain and Israel recognizing this opportunity has aligned themselves more strategically with the powerful big kid on the block by waging war with her partner. This not only maintains current military experience, but also enhances any technological advancement in warfare and economy through the U.S. It also insures a furtherance of intelligence sharing that have been enjoyed since before WWII.

Dominantly, when talking of the ability of waging war, the United States, Russia, China and India lead the world, with all banking operations ran through a family conglomerate. India is on the list for top five ‘material’ assets for waging war, yet they have very little experience in doing so and would suffer massive losses in any major campaign adjusting to actual battlefield operations.

Also with monetary pressure that the EU enforces over member states Britain can play both sides of the fence when it comes to funding war time effort. The European Union would hate to lose Great Britain as a member state to some new alliance with the United States (Brexit), however I do not see this as happening and believe the U.K. will be brought back into the Euro fold.

In an attack on Europe, Britain could only be on the side of the U.S. for this to take place. Historians say Hitler took much of Europe in six weeks; Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, and France. Poland went down in less than a month. Granted, a war campaign against Europe would break every peace accord the U.S. has ever signed. In 2003 the invasion of Iraq showed the world that when you’re the big boy on the block signed documents mean very little when stacked against political & economic agenda. In 1939 Germany did likewise with Poland.

The assault on Europe by land could only occur if France conceded not to use nuclear weapons. Any attempt to assault Russia or China would meet with catastrophic results. In any event, the Euro as a whole would be replaced by the dollar. To even imagine the U.S. attacking Europe for mere possession is really ridiculous and we are only discussing this to shut down the doomsayers who would actually ask the question, what if?

The U.S. military would initiate the draft and this of course would spark any defensive measures on nations of the world. They would in fact anticipate our actions in this modern information society. Moreover, Russian social intervention would surely render the American culture tied in knots through political and psychological (PsyOp) operations through Political Parties and College institutions. The Russians are masters at psychological operations as history proves. No student of history should doubt the tactical social accomplishments of the Soviets in the 60’s.

Yes, it is possible for the United States to defeat Europe and liberate them from the oppressive, corrupt EU rule, or so it could be said. Would all EU citizens obey? No, there would be Guerilla war for as long as we’re their masters. And what about China and Russia?

The Russian Federation has 144,000,000 citizens and would throw every one of them into battle including every nuke in their arsenal if it meant protecting the motherland. In WWII the Soviet Union threw two million at the German attack in two weeks time. They were sending farmers with pitchforks against Panzer tanks to slow them down. Russia would fight to the last man. In scripture we find that the Russian armies are annihilated fighting against Israel so this event of the U.S. fighting the Russian Federation is simply illogical before Armageddon, as it would mean nuclear devastation on a grand scale.

In Revelation we find an army of 200,000,000 that kills a third of man on the earth. At China’s current 1.3 billion population this accounts for less than 20% of the total, which in another fifty years would be dramatically increased. So this army as found in Revelation could easily be China’s. On European soil China’s nukes would have devastating effect to any army. Land assault against China is unwinnable. Nukes realistically would be the only consideration in making preparations for Europe if China did not concede beforehand.

“And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared. And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.” Revelation 16:12-16

“And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God, Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates. And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men. And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand: and I heard the number of them.

And thus I saw the horses in the vision, and them that sat on them, having breastplates of fire, and of jacinth, and brimstone: and the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions; and out of their mouths issued fire and smoke and brimstone. By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths. For their power is in their mouth, and in their tails: for their tails were like unto serpents, and had heads, and with them they do hurt. And the rest of the men which were not killed by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils, and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk: Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts.” Revelation 9:13-21

The extrapolation of the verse above is seen as war machines, tanks, helicopters, shooting missiles, cannon fire, etc,. If one believes this, clearly tanks are the number 1 source of fire power that will be used based on global military inventory as of 2019. Tanks in the middle east, China, and Russia are the most numerous asset for ground war.

Here is a current list of main battle tanks (MBT’s) and light tanks:

  1. Russia – 21,932
  2. China – 13,050
  3. United States – 6,287
  4. North Korea – 6,075
  5. Syria – 5,035
  6. India – 4,184
  7. Turkey – 3,200
  8. Israel – 2,760
  9. South Korea – 2,654
  10. Vietnam – 2,575
  11. Algeria – 2,475
  12. Bulgaria – 2,440
  13. Pakistan – 2,200
  14. Egypt – 2,160
  15. Ukraine – 2,031

Now that’s the top 15, but lets look at Israel’s enemies in the Middle East and their combined tank power:

  1. Syria – 5,035
  2. Turkey – 3,200
  3. Algeria – 2,475
  4. Egypt – 2,160
  5. Iran – 1,634
  6. Jordan – 1,313
  7. Saudi Arabia – 1,062
  8. Yemen – 826
  9. UAE – 510
  10. Iraq – 309
  11. Libya – 300
  12. Lebanon – 276
  13. Tunisia – 199
  14. Bahrain – 180
  15. Qatar – 95

Total tanks in the Middle East, not including super powers: 19,574

Source: Global Fire Power

Combined with Russia and China you have a fighting force of over 50,000 tanks to fight Europe and Israel without including the Baltic partners of Russia. Israel has less than 3,000 tanks and the prophecy of Zechariah portrays the use of nuclear warfare to take out this massive army.

Zechariah 14:12,16-17

“And this shall be the plague with which the Lord will strike all the people who fought against Jerusalem: Their flesh shall dissolve while they stand on their feet, their eyes shall dissolve in their sockets, and their tongues shall dissolve in their mouths.”

“And it shall come to pass that everyone who is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall go up from year to year to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, and to keep the Feast of Tabernacles. And it shall be that whichever of the families of the earth do not come up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, on them there will be no rain.”

Now many of the countries listed above are not Israel’s enemies. In fact, Israel and Jordan have long been working on the joint Dead Sea project and enjoy mutual relations. Moreover, King Abdullah II is Custodian of the Islamic and Christian holy sites in Jerusalem. Since the 1920’s the Jordanian King has been responsible for defending, protecting, and preserving the city and its Islamic and Christian holy sites. King Abdullah is truly a blessed man.

In scripture we clearly see that the whole world unites to destroy Israel. Any military assets within the Middle East will be thrown against Israel and used for the world’s crushing war machine as directed by the beast.

Kazakhstan has a large stockpile of nukes (supposedly dismantled) and is currently an Exxon Mobil partner with the U.S. as they have signed a forty-year contract giving Exxon a 55% stake. Interesting to note Wikipedia does not include the above energy partnership in their dialogue of U.S. Kazakhstan relations. Apparently they don’t want you, the reader, to know that.

“Right now, the creation of such a NATO base in the region is unrealistic. Kazakhstan is a member of the CSTO.* In the context of its partnership with Moscow, Astana wouldn’t make such decisions, at least not while Nursultan Nazarbayev remains in power. How the situation will change when he leaves office is another matter. In the examples of Armenia and Ukraine, we see how quickly the political situation in a particular country can change.” Watching America

I’m sure Russia is very nervous about any new bases in their region and will do everything in their power to stop that from happening. And what about India? Pakistan is currently an ally of the U.S. and would certainly fight against India in such a scenario, but again India also has a nuclear arsenal and a far superior military force. So we see these scenarios are highly unlikely as each chess move brings about the use of nuclear weapons and grandiose annihilation.

So if the United States took Europe could the beast now come to power as Christianity takes a dive worldwide? Yes, it’s possible. However, Europe would be in ruins from the war and guerrilla warfare would rage for decades – there would be no peace. How long would all of this take?

Lets compare to some scenarios that are current with guerrilla warfare, or freedom fighter campaigns.

Russo-Ukrainian War

Started in 2014 and has been ongoing for five years. Russia annexed Crimea in a strategic land mass grab. Regardless of the reason why Russia took Crimea, we can clearly see the area is critical for Naval movement. In fact, just south within Georgia, Krasnodar Krai is the home of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. Thus, necessary to hold north all the ports that feed the Sea of Azov, which flow into the Black Sea. Militarily, it is the correct action, albeit, Ukraine disagrees and has been fighting ever since. If you look at the map below the red signifies Russian control:

The above is a mere example of how long it takes to control a small section of land for the purpose of military flow. In war time, such as WWII, things move much quicker, but so does retaliation by allies. Russia cannot fiscally afford all out war by aggressively taking large sections of land without careful political and psychological baby steps with NATO and the U.S.

If one country invades another there will be war for sometime. If one nation invades an entire continent, well you can imagine – to hold said continent would require every resource at hand and endless militarized control. Decades? Try forever; the U.S. has been in Iraq for twenty years and as long as oil flows they will never leave and will always protect the energy asset. How long did the U.S. reside in Japan or Germany? Our bases are still there.

It’s just not plausible that the beast could come to power in the above fashion of ‘lightning war’ tactics such as Hitler used. Those times are long gone with nuclear warheads an ever possibility. The only way to invade territory is step by step, piece by political piece.

So then, is the question realistic that the United States would invade Europe under the dark messiah?

It’s just a theory and a poor one at that.